Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
A window to this question can be found in the recent ruling of the United States Patent and Trademark Office decision in connection with oppositions filed by Royal Crown Company and Dr Pepper/Seven Up Inc.Royal Crown Company (RCC), opposed The Coca-Cola Company’s (TCCC) application for registrations of 17 marks, all of which contain the word ‘ZERO’, for goods in class 32, namely soft drinks, sports drinks, and, energy drinks. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:36 pm
This emotionally charged case was fully litigated in the South Carolina courts and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
Even the United States Supreme Court, I've discovered, has called it the "California District Court of Appeals," and has done so a half-dozen times. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
See,e .g., United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
Sentelle, then clerked on the United States Supreme Court with both Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
Sentelle, then clerked on the United States Supreme Court with both Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the state-action doctrine in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:13 pm
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
Yesterday’s case is United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:59 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:56 am
In the United States District Court, Southwestern District, Tempe, Arizona Case No. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 7:03 am
Here, the male nurse practitioner benefited from good timing, and good timing is a gender-neutral factor “other than sex. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:27 am
Heard, State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:29 am
(NA) Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Texas in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
In today's decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
And in 2012, the government of the United States is one of the parties before the Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
It cites United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:08 pm
I guess he wants to lock in the adverse ruling as the binding law of the Western United States. [read post]
