Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 24,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 1:15 pm
That’s why the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 19 other media organizations are urging the Supreme Court of the United States to overturn an appeals court ruling in Carpenter v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:48 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:03 am
United States and Printz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
The UFC has extended its agreement with Joe Hand Promotions allowing the company to continue serving as the exclusive commercial distributor of UFC pay-per-view events in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:21 am
That ruling, United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:44 am
The brief was filed in State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
Citations to the second most-cited state, the United Kingdom, made up only 3% of the total. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
And so begins its decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:32 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Remote sellers are exempt from collection obligations if they have less than $500,00 per year in sales in the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:21 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2012), an opinion issued last month by the D.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am
The following post is by Mark Graber, co-editor with Mark Tushnet and Sanford Levinson of the recently published Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
Last week, in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
The specific software Jones used to identify Dillow is, so far as the briefing reveals, in the sole possession of the Perrysburg PoliceDepartment -- Dillow recites the language of Rule 16 in his Motion in a bid to place the software programs within its scope, but does not specifically allege that the United States Attorney has actual control over that software. . . . [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:39 pm
On January 18, 2012, in Mims v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:21 pm
United States. [read post]
