Search for: "mark"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 135,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 5:14 am
" Applicant's mark is not incorporated into wording or into another design, as is the case in registered marks cited by the applicant. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:20 am
The ellipsis and the question mark of the contested mark have no relevant impact on the aural comparison. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 10:35 am
We recently reported that Cisco had launched a trade mark infringement claim against Apple over use of its registered `iphone` trade mark. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:51 am
NOTING THE HUFFINGTON POST’S DIFFERING TREATMENT of Roman Polanski and Mark Foley. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:55 pm
Descriptive marks are weak by nature and will not be given the same scope of protection as an inherently distinctive mark. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:45 am
Therefore, Applicant argued that its marks, "in addition to their intended service mark usage, serve as a form of artistic expression. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:03 am
"However, the Board did find the AMERICAN GIRL mark to be a "strong mark for dolls and doll accessories. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:55 am
"] The Board found that the applied-for marks BINION and BINION'S are "actually closer to the registered mark" than the three prior marks. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:52 am
But plaintiff did not register the Japonais mark. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:13 am
Times reports of a trade mark dispute between Apple and Japanese Fujitsu’s over the mark iPAD (in relation to class 9 goods). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:35 am
PIL also alleged that LeapFrog sent PIL cease and desist letters warning that LeapFrog's earlier use of the POINGO mark gave it priority in the mark. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 3:12 pm
Any actual association between the mark or trade name and the famous mark. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 7:18 am
These marks, known as “deadwood,” block a new mark’s application for a similar mark despite the fact that the old one was abandoned. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:08 pm
Interestingly enough, in the Italian case, distinctiveness of the Vespa Italian 3D trade mark was not at issue.Then, on 29 November, the General Court ruled (T-19/22) on the distinctiveness of the Vespa EU 3D mark, eventually ruling that the EUIPO Board of Appeal had erred in holding that registration invalid due to lack of distinctive character.Incidentally, both proceedings stemmed from a long-running dispute between Piaggio and a Chinese company accused by the former of… [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:04 am
Link to blog entry posted by Mark Reichenbach on On the Mark, December 6, 2007: It's a good day here at On the Mark. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:24 am
For example, you are not allowed to dilute a famous mark. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
Only three of five third-party registrations involved marks having the same structure as the marks at issue, and there was no evidence that those marks are in use. [read post]
14 May 2025, 7:15 am
Next, the Board deemed Applicant’s mark and Opposer’s THE IVY LEAGUE and IVY LEAGUE marks to be "similar because they share the same phonetically identical dominant terms, 'IV LEAGUE' in Applicant’s mark and 'IVY LEAGUE' in opposer’s marks. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
What about the marks? [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
But what about the marks? [read post]
