Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 6301 - 6320 of 32,313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
First the judge noted that, in Regeneron, the patent involved a product claim for a mouse that had human gene segments inserted in it (in a range from 1 to 125 segments). [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” During tryouts, students were taking turns throwing the shot put, which was a metal ball that weighed 8-10 pounds. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 1:23 pm by Gene Takagi
Ruscus, Morgan Lewis; Amber Mackenzie, Senior Technical Reviewer and Acting Branch Chief, Exempt Organizations Branch 1 (EEE), Office of Chief Counsel, IRS; Sarah Daya, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), IRS; Patrick Clinton, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), IRS; Dianna Seaborn, Director of the Office of Financial Assistance, Office of Capital Access, U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:32 am by Nicole Pottroff
In reaching its decision, the court acknowledged that FAR Part 8 does not include the same type of “substantive yardstick for limiting an agency decision to cancel a procurement” that FAR Part 14 does (for the cancellation of sealed bid procurements after opening). [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Rome II Regulation[1] governs matters of non-contractual obligations. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:07 am by anne
A whistleblower does not need to be a citizen of the U.S. to be eligible for a whistleblower reward. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
She is the co-author of the #1 selling book on cost containment, Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:13 am by Jan von Hein
The Court ruled out an interpretation not congruent with that in Art. 8 (2) Rome II (applicable law) or Art. 7 no. 2 Brussels Ia (international jurisdiction for national trademarks). [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
A cynical reading of the UN proposal could lead to considering that the prerogative of establishing the applicable law remains with the relevant court, as the fact that the victim may request something does not necessarily mean that the request ought to be granted (Note that paragraph 1 uses “shall” while paragraph 2 uses “may”). [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 11:45 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
This is, however, not sufficient to establish that the priority rights derived from either application have also been transferred to the applicant.8. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Elizabeth Howell
Following the hearing, Family Court issued its adjudication order finding the children to be neglected under KRS 600.020(1)(a)(2), (3), (4), and (8) and found there were no less restrictive means than removal. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:29 am by Kevin Kaufman
This does not mean that other consequences do not come along with consumption tax policy decisions. [read post]