Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 7,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 8:48 am
Supreme Court Noone, R (on the application of) v Governor of HMP Drake Hall & Anor [2010] UKSC 30 (30 June 2010) Smith, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 (30 June 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust v Fox & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 729 (30 June 2010) Forson v The Governing Body of Harwich School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 751 (30 June 2010) ZK (Afghanistan) v Secretary… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Smith kept intact the pseudo-constitutional requirement that the jury pool reflect a "cross-section of the community," a requirement fabricated from thin air by the Warren Court, contrary to the unmistakable history of the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
Six of the nine justices who heard the case in March at the Supreme Court overturned High Court and Court of Appeal judgments over the death of Private Jason Smith in Iraq while serving with the Territorial Army. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
"Smith condemns Fiji press crackdown" http://j.mp/9QuhUP i'm not sure what this means ... [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
We now have the answer to this question in the form of KCI Licensing v Smith and Nephew Inc, a judgment recently handed down by Arnold J (here, noted by the IPKat here).In this case a US provisional application was filed in the name of the inventor, with KCI being the successor in title. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
Discerning readers will however note that this issue also lay at the heart of last week's Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Class 46) Poland Reputation's rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith &… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gibbon v Manchester City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 726 (25 June 2010) Steele v The Home Office [2010] EWCA Civ 724 (25 June 2010) Smith v Cooper & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 722 (25 June 2010) Smith v Co-Operative Group Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 725 (25 June 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bowles v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1460 (25 June 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Evans, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
If so … (Class 46) Poland Reputation’s rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith & … [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
The priority document, relied on by KCI, was a US patent application which named one Lina as the sole inventor of the invention, for which he was the sole applicant. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:39 am
The issues the Court addressed today included: (1) when the constitutional ratio for exemplary damages has to be applied and when it can be exceeded (the cattle-rustling case), (2) when litigation has to be stayed for arbitration of a related issue, and (3) another application of City of Waco v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Pankina [2010] EWCA Civ 719 (23 June 2010) Khader v Aziz & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 716 (23 June 2010) Annulment Funding Company Ltd v Cowey & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 711 (23 June 2010) Sugar v The British Broadcasting Commission & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 715 (23 June 2010) AET Inc Ltd v Arcadia Petroleum Ltd “Eagle Valencia” [2010] EWCA Civ 713 (23 June 2010) Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Deane… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:36 am
There are two Committee members (Aidikoff and Caruso) whom SIPC seems to claim are plaintiffs’ lawyers (the claim appears to be correct), and three (Borg, Lubin and Smith), who are state securities officials. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The skilled addressee would understand that the patent specification meant there were two separate ways to secure the loose ends of the braid, and that a clamp meant the application of an external device to hold the strands together as opposed to fusing them together with solder or a weld [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:05 pm
When Schwartz responded that a California statute left intact vacancy control, Kozinski cut him off with "the real answer is 'no,' Pennell is not applicable. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
The three judges who ruled on the case were the two highest judges in the court – the Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls – as well as Lady Justice Smith. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
There does seem to be widespread understanding of the logic of parasitism in public choice economics, but I think it much more broadly applicable than that. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:26 am
” Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
