Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm
The Utah Court of Appeal recently issued its decision in the case of Salt Lake City Corporation v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:06 am
Here are a few quick running thoughts from today's oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Colorado, Timbs v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 4:37 pm
"On Wednesday, the state of Louisiana is to file a brief of up to 4,500 words expressing its views on the merits of the issue raised its petition for rehearing in Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 9:23 am
The post Comments on the Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:14 pm
In Heim v. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 10:16 am
In the case of Gillespie v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 6:36 pm
Hopefully, when presented with that evidence, the appellate courts will allow this case to be finally resolved. [read post]
26 May 2007, 8:03 am
Schumm v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 9:53 am
Valenzuela v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
In Shehu v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:44 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Door-to-door evangelism and data protection: Jehovah’s Witnesses v Finland" in Law & Religion UK, 9 May 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/05/09/door-to-door-evangelism-and-data-protection-jehovahs-witnesses-v-finland/ [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:26 pm
The case of Bowdler v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:04 am
The case of Husted v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The existence and extent of this obligation will depend on the facts of the particular case. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 9:53 am
The court’s ruling in State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
[A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:24 pm
DuBrin, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn People v Farkas (_NY_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01318 [2/22/11]), the Court of Appeals decided a very important 30.30 case - against the defendant- but in so ruling confirmed principles that will often help defendants seeking to move to dismiss a superseding accusatory on 30.30 grounds. [read post]
