Search for: "Doe 5" Results 6301 - 6320 of 85,590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
First, for purposes of pleading a discrimination claim, it does not matter that plaintiff's supervisors had previously treated plaintiff well. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
  It is also unfortunate that no mention was made of recital 40 of both the UK and EU GDPR which states that a “legislative measure … does not necessarily require a legislative act adopted by a parliament” but “should be clear and precise and its application should be foreseeable”. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:30 am by Rania Combs
This article was originally published on April 5, 2010 and updated on April 18, 2023. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:19 am by Hepworth Holzer, LLP
If a dog does attack, use an object to create a barrier between you and the dog, such as a purse or jacket. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:05 am by Eliana Baer
While that insight certainly illustrates the ways in which a secular court may be hamstrung in its ability to compel a husband to provide a Get, it still does not resolve the ultimate issue of how a court can adequately address this issue without implicating First Amendment concerns. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 5 April 2023, Hill J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis in the case of Rayney v Reynolds [No 4] [2022] WASC 360. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” FDUTPA: A prevailing party in a FDUTPA action may recover reasonable costs and attorney’s fees from the nonprevailing party according to the court’s discretion, which does not require exceptionality but does require consideration of case- and party-related factors, as well as deterrence. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant moved pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), (5), and (7) to dismiss the complaint. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Scott Bomboy
“Section 27001 does not single out for differential treatment, for example, political honking, ideological honking, celebratory honking, or honking to summon a carpool rider,” wrote Circuit Judge Michelle T. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 11:14 pm by Thomas Nantias
What If My Employer Does Not Have Workers’ Compensation Insurance? [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:04 pm by News Desk
Plant does not have a history of problematic room temperatures. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am by Russell Knight
“In allocating parenting time, the court shall not consider conduct of a parent that does not affect that parent’s relationship to the child. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]