Search for: "Doe v. Smith"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 7,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 4:11 am
Schachter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:34 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:11 pm
Schachter v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm
" We also agree with the further contention of defendant that the fact that he received the bargained-for sentence does not preclude him from seeking our discretionary review of his sentence pursuant to CPL 470.15 (6) (b) (see People v Smith, 32 AD3d 553, 554; see generally People v Pollenz, 67 NY2d 264; People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513, 519-520). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:32 am
In a recent federal Florida decision, Smith v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
Guerrilla marketing does seem new. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
" The two current cases are the predictable result of the 2005 decision Roper v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:21 am
Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:35 am
It held that the lease does not require an "independent" certified public accountant to determine the operating expenses and that the landlord complied with the lease provisions by employing its internal certified public accountant to determine the operating expenses. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
Further, since Officer Smith's opinion does not fit into any legally recognized exception to this rule, his opinion is inadmissible. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:34 pm
Smith & Nephew Pty Ltd v Wake Forest University Health Sciences [2009] FCAFC 142 [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Although this may not cause a considerable impact on professional sports leagues and teams if the player is a substitute who does not play, consider if the situation arose in the case of a marquee player. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: Bromley killed Jason Voss with a shotgun in 2007. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
Berghuis v Smith, Supreme Court No. 08-1402. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
A careful analysis of the derivatives-related scandals mentioned above show that the source of the problem does not merely emerge from the use of the derivatives but instead, from either a failure to properly use such instruments, or from other externalities such as poor corporate governance mechanisms. [read post]
