Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 6301 - 6320 of 12,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm by Daniel Hemel
June 29, 2012), in which Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock hewed closely to the reasoning in Freedman. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm by Daniel Hemel
June 29, 2012), in which Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock hewed closely to the reasoning in Freedman. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm by Daniel Hemel
June 29, 2012), in which Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock hewed closely to the reasoning in Freedman. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:38 pm by Patricia Salkin
This court assumes that it does apply, but found that the fines are not excessive. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The proposed amendment would create a new section 29 to article X of the Florida Constitution, and states: ARTICLE X, SECTION 29. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 7:43 pm by Aurelia J. Schultz
  It does this by setting limitations on the types of processes and information that can be required by a trademark office. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
Robert Patterson, ECF No. 49-1 (publicly-filed redacted version). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:44 pm by Bill Marler
  [1, 15, 33] CDC statistics show that food is the most common vehicle of transmission for noroviruses; of 232 outbreaks of norovirus between July 1997 and June 2000, 57% were foodborne, 16% were spread from person-to-person, and 3% were waterborne. [6, 31] When food is the vehicle of transmission, contamination occurs most often through a food handler improperly handling a food directly before it is eaten. [4, 9, 10] Infected individuals shed the virus in large numbers in their vomit… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:46 am
§ 843(c)(1) (“The term `advertisement’ does not include material which merely advocates the use of a similar material, which advocates a position or practice, and does not attempt to propose or facilitate an actual transaction in a Schedule I controlled substance. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
The Stockholm District Court does not appear to think so. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:45 am
’In re Steele, supra.The opinion does not summarize whatever allegations and/or statements were in Count 4. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:34 am by J
But, I wonder, does this still hold true after Arnold, Francis and Assethold? [read post]