Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 7:00 pm
The Court of Appeal emphasised earlier this week in R v Dobson that “compelling evidence” does not mean that the evidence must be irresistible, or that absolute proof of guilt is required. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:01 am
No. 33 Given that Nigeria’s legal system is “based on the English common law legal tradition,” in addition to the above laws, judicial precedents control matters relating to elections. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:00 pm
I remember it formed part of our rather painful and protracted analysis of the methods, means and history of piercing the corporate veil under English law. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
See United Kingdom v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:30 am
But just see the ICSID press release on the live stream of the Public Hearing started today in the matter Railroad Development Corporation v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:14 am
Ok, now what does that mean in plain English? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:24 am
Plaintiffs also alleged manager was heard expressly saying she wished to staff the restaurant with a younger workforce who all spoke English. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 1:45 am
Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:42 am
Professor Jiwa, who works in Amarillo College as an English professor, draws a salary of $58,000 per annum as at last year. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
Of the new forms, following the decision in Granovsky Estate v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:25 pm
The case is entitled Dance Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
Conclusion: Employers should use plain English, precise language to describe their non-compete restrictions, and employees should not sign an agreement unless they understand what restraints they are agreeing to, as these agreements are enforceable in Texas, when written correctly. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:33 pm
Mazzeo (below right), Assistant Professor of English at Colby College in Waterville, Maine, could find no evidence that Barbe-Nicole ever left France. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:01 am
The French Republic v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:13 pm
8 CFR § 1208.16(c)(3)(ii); see also Kamara v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Economically the programs of incentives are part of China's 50-year technology plan which is confirmed by the National Patent Development Strategy released a few weeks ago (click here to see the English translation). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:15 am
For those who are unable to translate tu stultus es into English - you are stupid. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:14 am
Goddard (link, link) once an English professor at Swarthmore. [read post]
8 Aug 2005, 4:36 am
AsÃ, casi todo el post se hacÃa incomprensible, con frases de este tenor, "En el fallo MGM v. , la Corte Suprema dijo" (sic). [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:56 pm
The applicant must be in one of the following categories at time of enlistment a. asylee, refugee, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), or b. nonimmigrant categories E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U, or V 2. [read post]
