Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 6301 - 6320 of 15,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
Unfortunately, Parts IV, V, VI, which deal with substantive IP rights and practice, loses the personal touch and insight that the early and final chapters possess. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:43 am by Aimee Hess
The Texas Supreme Court recently addressed how a bequest in a will of a double fractional oil and gas interest should be interpreted in Hysaw v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
It was about a really tricky habeas question, about figuring out whether a state court decided a case on a procedural or substantive ground. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, it was surprising how little the “substantial burden” argument figured in the government’s argument. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
The Court also pointed out that the applicants had the chance to contest these figures before the Court of Appeal, and did not explain why they thought such a course of action would fail, or at least why it was not capable of increasing the fines which they felt were too low [70] to [71]. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:50 pm by Staff Writer
In 1934, the famed jurist Learned Hand once offered this classic definition of tax avoidance in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Steven Schwinn
The Court also spent significant time trying to figure out if Himmelreich’s Section 2680 argument runs contrary to the result in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
If we can figure out what went wrong with the legal workflow, we can perhaps figure out how to avoid the next formation mistake. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:54 am by Sara Josselyn
That figure is substantially higher than Health Canada’s estimate for the medical marijuana market. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:16 am by John Jascob
The SEC’s ALJ regime has faced a number of constitutional challenges, including appeals pending before the Second, Fourth, and Eleventh Circuits (Pierce v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:09 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v City of Knoxville, 2016 WL 746503 (TN App. 2/25/2016)    Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Non-Conforming Uses, Signs, Uncategorized [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
That  concern came fully into the open on Monday as the Court held a seventy-minute hearing on the case of Wittman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:46 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
As illustrated in the Pinellas County Circuit Court's online docket for Bollea v. [read post]