Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 6301 - 6320 of 76,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
Employee denied unemployment insurance benefits after resigning despite assurances of continued employment notwithstanding a layoffMatter of Ruggiero v Commissioner of Labor, 63 AD3d 1477Elaine Ruggiero learned that resigning from one's position in anticipation of being laid off does not constitute good cause for leaving one's employment when she attempted to overturn the Commissioner of Labor’s determination denying her application for unemployment… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Morales’ damages were actual and ascertainable, Marinelli v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:14 am by ipdeals
The recent CAFC decision in Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron (http://www.patentlyo.com/09-1283.pdf) provides a good reminder that sending an invitation to license or discuss licensing of a patent to a potential target might be enough post-MedImmune to justify declaratory judgment (DJ) jurisdiction when the target wishes to challenge the patent-in-interest in district court. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
A very good ruling from the 4th District recently... just came online today: Leith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 12:07 am
This is a very good Becky Mowbray story in yesterday's Times-Picayune following up on the recent Kodrin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:27 pm by Elizabeth Hopkins
  The Court granted certiorari to review whether the Second Circuit correctly applied the Court’s “more harm than good” standard set forth in Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 8:30 pm
The Supreme Court put the case on hold pending the outcome if Philip Morris v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:14 am by ipdeals
The recent CAFC decision in Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron (http://www.patentlyo.com/09-1283.pdf) provides a good reminder that sending an invitation to license or discuss licensing of a patent to a potential target might be enough post-MedImmune to justify declaratory judgment (DJ) jurisdiction when the target wishes to challenge the patent-in-interest in district court. [read post]