Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 6301 - 6320 of 58,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm by Orin Kerr
This issue is being litigated all over the country right now thanks to a clash of two recent Fourth Amendment cases, Herring v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:10 pm
Perhaps you voted for her, perhaps you didn't. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
The first was a “welcome” email on her arrival and the second was an email stating that residents and strata managers had complained to him about a “noisy, late-night party” in Murray’s flat. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
In the context of these applications, the fact of and reasons for his arrest were stated in open court. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s contention that the motion court in the fee dispute would have awarded her predecision interest pursuant to CPLR 5001 is at best speculative (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, 443 [2007]; see also Manufacturer’s & Traders Trust Co. v Reliance Ins. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Name-clearing hearingsAquilone v City of New York, 262 AD2d 13, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 819A public employee who has been terminated from his or her position may be entitled to a name-clearing hearing if the reasons for his or her separation have been made public by the employer and those reasons tend to “stigmatize” the individual.The Aquilone case addresses whether a retiree who continues to work as a consultant to the employer is entitled… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The judge began her analysis of the issue in the case, explaining that `[i]t is well established that the 1st Amendment protects the right to anonymous speech. [read post]