Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 6301 - 6320 of 8,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2007, 8:09 pm
The most obvious guess is Justice Kennedy. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
As a result, we are likely to see a bit of tortured jurisprudence coming out of the actual case, Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:45 am
Crime and Consequences reports that (according to this New York Times article), "85 Republican members of the House of Representatives have requested that the Supreme Court reconsider its decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:59 am by Kali Borkoski
At PrawfsBlawg, Lior Strahilevitz looks at NASA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 7:36 am by Dan Farber
In the end, however, they came on board, along with several state governments. [read post]
30 May 2010, 7:59 pm
" In a concurring opinion in the Supreme Court flag-burning case (Texas v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:47 pm
It covers solos to mid-sized firms across all 50 states, with about 5,000 respondents. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:09 am
In a concurring opinion in the Supreme Court flag-burning case (Texas v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
Dan Kennedy in Media Nation notes that Judge Torruella ignored a 1964 ruling in Times v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 1:40 pm
In the former category are Justices Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:32 am by David Stras
Bidish Sarma (The Justice Center’s Capital Appeals Project) has posted “Still in Search of a Unifying Principle: What Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:13 am by Kiran Bhat
Berman notes that the First and Fifth Circuits have recently applied the Court’s recent decision in Tapia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:55 pm by Amy Howe
’” At the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief that the State and Local Legal Center filed in Heffernan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 10:53 am by Michael O'Hear
Finally, On Point weighs in on the Court’s other habeas decision last week, Harrington v. [read post]