Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 6301 - 6320 of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Ed. 2d 1 (2002), '[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level,' Bell Atl. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Republicans control all facets of lawmaking at the state level in Florida. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:39 pm by Shari Shapiro
 "Preemption" is when a higher level of government (like the Federal government) prohibits a lower level of government (like the states or municipalities) from regulating the same issue. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:40 am by Meg Martin
Voigt, dissenting: The Chief Justice would have reversed because the State’s community safety argument in the instant case was indistinguishable from the State’s community safety argument in Strange v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The Second Circuit says the state regulation is legal and does not deny the students their rights under federal law.The case is Bryant v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:29 pm by GPL
-The stairwell at issue was at the back of the store and connected the main level of the store to a lower level of the store; patrons were prohibited from using the stairs, and on the day of the fall, there was a chain across the top of the stairs. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:25 am by Whitney Hodges
California’s Statewide Cannabis Regulatory Scheme California has a dual regulatory scheme for cannabis licensing – meaning licensure or permitting is required at both the state and local level. [read post]
  Some statutes tie the exclusion to the pay level of a particular employee or the number of employees on the payroll or average payroll wages.[4]  Other exemptions apply only to casual or seasonal labor. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:32 am by David Klein
Readers will remember that last year’s landmark Supreme Court decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm by CJLF Staff
  Illinois, along with several other states, have initiated the re-sentencing of those who received life terms as juveniles following the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am by Venkat
None of the foregoing statements rose to the level of defamation per se (where damage is presumed). [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:35 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s ruling in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]