Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 6301 - 6320 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Redbox https://t.co/PDYCDmDs1D 2020-04-26 Freezing order made in the UK to enforce trade secret misappropriation judgment in the United StatesMotorola Solut… https://t.co/iwAWqlGowy 2020-04-27 Statutory damages for copyright infringement of a web site about page awarded2020 FC 379 (CanLII) | Biofert Manufa… https://t.co/rLkxftb72G 2020-04-27 Link to York University v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Redbox https://t.co/PDYCDmDs1D 2020-04-26 Freezing order made in the UK to enforce trade secret misappropriation judgment in the United StatesMotorola Solut… https://t.co/iwAWqlGowy 2020-04-27 Statutory damages for copyright infringement of a web site about page awarded2020 FC 379 (CanLII) | Biofert Manufa… https://t.co/rLkxftb72G 2020-04-27 Link to York University v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The point of the law is to exercise an authority every State has: to provide more protection for religious liberties at the state level than the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am by Riana Harvey
 The Deputy Judge stated the importance of comparing the respective marks as a whole, rather than focusing on similarities and differences in their individual features. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
Garza, as well as a number of important cases in state or circuit courts.) [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The question of whether to grant a motion to stay in these circumstances was in need of appellate guidance with respect to a uniform way for state trial courts to address such motions.An Appellate Case of First ImpressionThat appellate guidance arrived in March of this year, when the Pennsylvania Superior Court, in a case of first impression at the state court appellate level, adopted the same six-factor test in the case of Keesee v. [read post]