Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 6301 - 6320 of 21,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2018, 3:02 am by Ben
Judge Liam O'Grady has declined to give the case up saying that it makes sense to hear the new action in the court where the BMG dispute was argued out, as many of the issues will be the same saying "Although defendants claim this court's ruling on the DMCA's safe harbour provision will not be relevant to this case, this court's prior ruling will at the very least touch on the issues presented here. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint alleges further that the individual defendants failed to correct the company’s misleading statements, rendering them personally liable. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:45 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
An individual who has suffered an injury caused by negligence may have legal recourse against the liable party, as illustrated in an August 17, 2018 case. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
More Blog Posts: Court Holds That Police Department May Be Liable for Officer’s Failure to Use Due Care While Responding to an Emergency, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published November 6, 2018. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:54 am by Neumann Law Group
After a trial, the jury found the defendants not liable for the plaintiff’s death. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:09 am by NZB
If minimum requirements for hiring were not met, the company can be held liable if compliance would have shown that the hired driver was unfit or incompetent. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The court stated that, as automobile accidents are specific events, a burden is placed upon the injured party to determine whether the other parties involved in the accident might be liable for any potential injuries.The court found that an argument of fraudulent concealment did not apply in this matter because, even if the Defendants had refused to respond to the Plaintiff’s inquiries, the Defendants did nothing to cause the Plaintiff to relax… [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
A whistleblower-employee who did not participate in the violation may not be legally liable yet can be viewed by colleagues and employer as a traitor who breached his loyalty. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:46 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Thus, unless the relationship between the parties fit within an exception to the general rule, Company B could not be liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:41 am by Megan B. Center and Alexander S. Radus
Franchisors will be required to do this regardless and it will give franchisees a bit more comfort in a sale situation. 5)  Personal Guaranty Typical Provision:  All of franchisee’s owners and each owner’s spouse must sign a personal guaranty making each individual personally liable for, and personally bound by, the terms and covenants in the Franchise Agreement. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Dennis Crouch
At trial, the patentee showed that the defendant knew of the patents and had been informed that its products were infringing once combined into TVs. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 8:11 am
Negligence proof - Claimants must also show the defendant failed to warn product users and conspired to hide information in favor of profits. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 8:11 am
Negligence proof - Claimants must also show the defendant failed to warn product users and conspired to hide information in favor of profits. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 6:37 am by Hirsch & Lyon Accident Law
  It’s worth noting, however, that the lawsuit may change depending on whether the defendant was operating a “commercial vehicle. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 6:37 am by Hirsch & Lyon
  It’s worth noting, however, that the lawsuit may change depending on whether the defendant was operating a “commercial vehicle. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Each of these statutes presupposes the existence of multiple defendants jointly and severally liable for the same damages. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 11:41 am by John L. Culhane, Jr. and Anthony C. Kaye
Although the AG’s complaint alleged that the interest rates charged on the transactions exceeded Virginia’s usury limits, it did not charge the defendants with violating the state’s usury laws. [read post]