Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 6301 - 6320 of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The Advocate General upheld the General Court’s decision that the State of Bavaria’s EUTM “Neuschwanstein”, a German fairy tale castle and popular tourist attraction, is not descriptive of the goods and services covered by the mark and not therefore not invalid. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
False Marking: The Supreme Court has denied certiorari in PubPat's False Marking case. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 1:36 pm
Trial Court Denies Class Action Certification Motion In Illinois State Court Employment Law Class Action Case Holding that Plaintiffs' Attorneys Failed to Provide a "Reasonable and Accurate Method of Calculating Damages on a Classwide Basis" Only a month after the Ninth Circuit upheld certification of a sex discrimination class action against Wal-Mart involving upwards of 2 million class members, see Dukes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 2:38 pm
Witness the decision of the First Department of New York's Appellate Division in Speranza v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 11:42 am
Witness the decision of the First Department of New York's Appellate Division in Speranza v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Today's appeal, in Case T-50/09 Ifemy’s Holding GmbH v OHIM, Dada & Co. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
By a vote of 6-3, the court dismissed as moot a Second Amendment challenge to New York City’s now-repealed limits on transporting personal firearms, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:32 am by Brian Craig
In affirming a district court’s dismissal because use of the marks constituted nominative fair use, the appeals court concluded that Applied’s service was not readily identifiable without use of the trademarks, the seminar creators used only so much of the trademarks as was reasonably necessary, and use of the trademarks did not suggest sponsorship or endorsement (Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:31 am by John W. Scanlan
The trademark owner satisfied the requirements for Article III standing (SM Kids, LLC v. [read post]
Case date: 26 January 2021 Case number: No. 19-2390 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:44 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Stephen Atherton and Don Krueger won in consolidated cases in State v. [read post]