Search for: "Mike"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 28,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
By Mike Dorf Give Chief Justice Roberts credit for wit. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:18 pm
By Mike Dorf Here's a plug for a new book co-authored by my colleague Eduardo Penalver and Fordham law professor Sonia Katyal. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:34 pm
Mike Dorf Future archeologists who read the Aug. 9, 2010 issue of the New Yorker may think that the uproarious piece therein by David Sedaris (abstract here) was written in reaction to the curious case of Steven Slater, the JetBlue flight attendant who finally cracked after dealing with one too many surly passengers. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
By Mike Dorf Today is the first Monday in October, and thus the start of a new Supreme Court Term. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
By Mike Dorf With yesterday's ruling by Judge Phillips striking down "Don't Ask Don't Tell," we appear to have reached a tipping point on judicial willingness to act to protect gay rights. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:54 am
By Mike Dorf Erwin Chemerinsky and James Sample have an interesting Op-Ed in yesterday's NY Times. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:58 am
By Mike Dorf Some years ago, Ronald Dworkin reported in the New York Review of Books that he was surprised when he was permitted, on a trip to China, to speak freely about such matters as human rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf At the risk of validating the stereotype that radical movements invariably degenerate into petty infighting, I'll begin by saying that if someone else hadn't beaten me to it, I'd be tempted to start an organization called Vegans Against PETA. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I discuss the cert grant in Bond v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest Verdict column, I argue that the legal battle over the constitutionality of the individual mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act raises a relatively unimportant constitutional question: Whether or not Congress has the authority, either under the taxing power or the commerce power, to mandate that individuals purchase a service (or good) from a private actor, Congress will remain nearly omnipotent. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:49 pm
By Mike Dorf My latest FindLaw column explains how nothing in constitutional law is every really, finally settled. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf Because I teach a one-semester constitutional law course, I don't spend much time on the Free Exercise or Establishment Clauses of the First Amendment (just one class on each). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:43 pm
By Mike Dorf Just under a year ago, I wrote a column comparing the brinksmanship of the Yankees and Derek Jeter to the brinksmanship on the Korean peninsula. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:05 pm
By Mike Dorf Amidst the justified celebration of the repeal of Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell (DADT), we might pause to marvel at the fact that two Republican Senators--Richard Burr (R-NC) and Ensign (R-NV)--voted against cloture but for repeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:54 pm
By Mike Dorf I spent the better part of today reading the Supreme Court's ACA ruling and talking to the press about it. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:12 pm
By Mike Dorf In a pair of articles in last Tuesdays NY Times, Adam Liptak offered an interesting statistical snapshot of law clerk hiring by the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:29 pm
By Mike Dorf* I hate to be the one to say "I told you so" (oh, all right, I love it), but based on reports of the oral argument yesterday, it appears that the Christian Legal Society may become the victim of its own aggressive legal strategy. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
By Mike Dorf Federal district courts have recently taken action on gay rights on three fronts: (1) Perry v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm
By Mike Dorf In my post yesterday, I noted that New York State Senate Republicans who are either on the fence or opposed to the pending bill to legalize same-sex marriage in the state have sought a broader religious exemption than the one in the current version of the bill. [read post]
