Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 6301 - 6320 of 9,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am by Eric A. Posner
The coronavirus pandemic has spawned the most massive emergency restrictions of citizens’ liberties in the history of the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, declaring that a religious duty to engage in polygamy was not a defense to a federal law against bigamy. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 11:29 am by Mark Ashton
 The United State Supreme Court is also a court of limited jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-474, involving former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud conviction; and Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
  Two such tables serve as a good example: cell and module prices in Figure V-13 on page V-47 of the Staff Report, and Table V-19 on page V-49 of the Staff Report, showing total CSPV cell and module share of the US market. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
  Two such tables serve as a good example: cell and module prices in Figure V-13 on page V-47 of the Staff Report, and Table V-19 on page V-49 of the Staff Report, showing total CSPV cell and module share of the US market. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:19 am by Susan Brenner
The 9th Circuit explained that it had reached the same conclusion in interpreting similar language in other criminal statutes: In United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
As the new year arrives, RegBlog would like to reflect on the many important regulatory developments and debates that occurred in the United States and around the world in 2016. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]