Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 51,405
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
In Sambrano v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 5:50 pm
Contents include:Chuanju Cheng, Securing the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Case of Taiwan and Hunting Kimberly Theidon, Guerrilla Governance: Troubling Gender in the FARC Douglas Pretsell & Timothy Willem Jones, How Human Rights Became Gay Rights: A History of Toonen v Australia Jenna Norosky & Charli Carpenter, The Right to Flee the Dangers of War: Rethinking Ukraine’s Gender-Based Restriction on Civilian Men’s Freedom of Movement Juan… [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:00 pm
In 2002, the ECHR ruled on a similar question in Pretty v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:19 am
A recent example of this was seen in the federal case of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
In the case, a Nevada federal district court upheld Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak's COVID-19 Order limiting worship services to no more than 50 people with social distancing. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:45 pm
By Thomas Sussman & Lisa Rosenberg, The Hill, June 3, 2019Recently, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that will probably fly under most people’s radar, but which may have dire consequences for the public, the press and even the free market.The case, Food Marketing Institute (FMI) v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 4:51 pm
It is co-produced by the Bar Association of Montreal and CAIJ (the free legal information portal of the Quebec Bar Association) in collaboration with the Supreme Court of Canada.The most recent episode deals with the case R. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:11 pm
People v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:04 am
People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:32 am
What some consider to be harmless exhibitionism may meet the statutory minimum for the crime of public indecency (see People v Reed). [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 6:36 pm
Hopefully, when presented with that evidence, the appellate courts will allow this case to be finally resolved. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 10:41 am
” United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
Medina did not receive the treatment to which he was legally entitled but, as he had been adjudicated incompetent, his case was not tried. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
As amply demonstrated in these two cases. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 1:35 pm
Losing the lottery results in these five people getting their federal convictions affirmed.It's a criminal case that gets taken en banc and that results in a starkly partisan split. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:15 pm
This is a fine example of why many people hate lawyers. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm
Particularly when the case goes to trial. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
No summary judgment.A critical case for a huge number of people in Southern California. [read post]
