Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 6301 - 6320 of 7,626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions In Lassanah v State of New South Wales (No. 3) [2010] NSWDC 241 The New South Wales considered a claim for false imprisonment and defamation. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
  If we assume that the list covers two thirds of the sums paid out in defamation and privacy damages in then the total 2008 damages awarded and paid out would, in round figures, be US$6.8 million. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:14 am by Kali Borkoski
On Tuesday, the Court will hear arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:01 am by Amanda Rice
The Court’s five-to-four vote to lift the stay of Jeffrey Landrigan’s execution, which Adam covered in yesterday’s round-up, continues to generate discussion. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Kate Bladow
Alvarez - Su Sie Ju, Bread for the City Volunteer Spotlight: DC Bar Pro Bono Program - Vytas V. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am by Adam Chandler
The second O’Connor story comes from the state of Nevada, where voters are considering a ballot initiative that would change the way the state judges are selected. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 am by James Bickford
Briefly: ACSblog posts a panel discussion of AT&T v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
  In an interesting obiter observation, the Judge considered a way round this difficulty. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am by Adam Chandler
In response to a question, the Chief Justice acknowledged that each member of the Court decides for him- or herself whether to attend the President’s State of the Union addresses. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Disputing has discussed “manifest disregard” of the law many times since the United States Supreme Court decision in Hall Street Associates, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am by Nabiha Syed
Galvin, which addressed whether the Voting Rights Act applies to state felon disenfranchisement laws. [read post]