Search for: "STATE v KEYS" Results 6301 - 6320 of 20,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Edmonds, "Isaac Backus and the Influence of Evangelical Separationism on the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment"
28 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
For example, in Everson v. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Vegan butter wins again
18 Aug 2021, 6:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Miyoko's Kitchen v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court Clarifies Pre-Suit Demand Analysis
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
In Rales v. [read post]
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - http://www.delawarelitigation.com/
SJC Holds Warrantless Search Conduction Outside of Officers’ Territorial Jurisdiction Unlawful
22 Dec 2017, 7:41 am by Daniel Cappetta
’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.massachusettscriminallawyer-blog.com/
Court Acknowledges Calls for Caution when Applying "Proportionality Test" to Preservation, Denies Motion for Protective Order
21 Oct 2011, 11:02 am by K&L Gates
Pippins v. [read post]
Electronic Discovery Law - http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/
Plata is a Net Benefit to Public Safety and Our Constitutional Rights
24 May 2011, 1:48 pm by Inimai Chettiar, ACLU
Yesterday's Supreme Court opinion in Brown v. [read post]
American Civil Liberties Union Blog - http://blog.aclu.org/blog
Some Uses Just Don't Belong: Land Use Law and "Caddyshack"
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
R.R.B. v. [read post]
South Carolina Business Law Blog - http://www.scbusinesslawblog.com/
Some Uses Just Don't Belong: Land Use Law and "Caddyshack"
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
R.R.B. v. [read post]
South Carolina Business Law Blog - http://www.scbusinesslawblog.com/
A reminder that originality threshold is low, but does indeed exist
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Ericsson and Apple settle 5G patent dispute during Texas and ITC trials, agree on global cross-license; $400 million one-off payment plus ongoing royalties at unknown rate
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am by Florian Mueller
Ericsson v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
Mannheim court reverses position on FRAND defense: standard-essential patent injunctions become readily available again
21 May 2020, 8:17 am by Florian Mueller
But then came the CJEU (in Huawei v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
Concise Summaries of "The Discipline Book" and "Challenging Adverse Personnel Decisions"
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Conceal and Carry Restrictions Can Help Protect Freedom of Expression
1 Oct 2021, 10:37 am by ACLU
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
ACLU News & Commentary - https://www.aclu.org/news/
The Cuba-Venezuela-U.S. Axis: Warfare on the Financial Front Intensifies
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
CJEU Advocate General clarifies when pseudonymised data falls outside the definition of personal data
10 Feb 2025, 3:29 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Rosie Nance
This concept is the root of data protection applicability so its impact would be significant; for example, for: Service providers handling data encrypted with state of the art cryptography and without key access – these service providers will find it easier to maintain that that data is not personal data in their hands. [read post]
Data Protection Report - http://www.dataprotectionreport.com/
A defensive non-assert? Philips v Asustek and HTC
20 Oct 2017, 1:43 am
  The cross-licence is governed by the laws of the state of California. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
The Hidden Merits Ruling in Murthy v. Missouri
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
The key is the difference between asking--i.e., jawboning--versus requiring through the coercive power of the state. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
A Better Book: Trust Oneself, then Know Oneself
20 Apr 2019, 12:01 pm by Sam Erman
Downes v. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
K = Na. Is the genie out of the bottle? PART 1
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
  The key point of the Actavis case is article 69 of the EPC and the Protocol on interpretation. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Qualcomm wins envelope tracker patent case against Apple in Munich, but will the injunction ever be enforced?
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm; Southern District of California: Apple and contract manufacturers v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com