Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 8,898
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
The civil rights lawsuit, Hall, et al v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
That’s not to say that a Saturday Night Live sketch should count as defamation—Hustler v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:37 am
"Right now, we're not getting the net effect across all teens that we're hoping for," says the author of that study, Scott V. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:50 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, termination of parental rights)Young v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
In Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:16 am
Young, Faculty Director, Jessica Y. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:30 am
AM v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf My latest Verdict column examines what's at stake in the Supreme Court case of Douglas v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:04 am
More to the point, I wonder if others reading the book had the same reaction that I did--and have any explanation for why, of all the cases with which to end such a story, Justice Stevens decided to go with a little tiny case about the ability of state-created agencies to pursue relief under Ex parte Young? [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:57 am
" Rebecca has more on this case, which reminded me a little of the classic Jacob & Young v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
His story is told through a lawsuit to which he was party, the landmark United States Supreme Court decision Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:33 am
(ii) When a become teenagers or young adults, they often want to find out more about their roots. [read post]
