Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 6301 - 6320
of 41,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
The language of the statute authorizes the court to order a juvenile to pay the state minimum state cost of not less than $68.00 for a felony. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:31 am
Higginbotham v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm
Taxation Division and Potter v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm
Taxation Division and Potter v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 7:30 am
State Department, Aug. 2, 2024 "The U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:34 pm
(b); County of Riverside v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:14 pm
Silja Vöneky2 During the last months John B. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:24 am
’” Quoting Friends of the Earth, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
See Peraza v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
B & P. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:01 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:52 am
State, supra; see TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE 901(b)(1), (4). [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:17 pm
United States, 431 U.S. 324, (1977) -- “dooms the plaintiffs’ request for certification under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:54 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: AC33291 - Local 84, Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, it Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm
The UCCJEA was recently at the forefront in Dalessio v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:09 pm
On August 7, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a notice identifying the applicability date of regulatory provisions relating to applications containing patentably indistinct claims which are enjoined in Tafas v. [read post]
