Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 6301 - 6320 of 13,583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Joy Waltemath
“[T]o establish personal liability in a Sec. 1983 action, it is enough to show that the official, acting under color of state law, caused the deprivation of a federal right,” the appeals court wrote. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Separate concurring opinions were filed by Justices Baxter and Chin (Ayala v Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc, June 30, 2014, Werdegar, K). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:01 pm
So holds the Washington Court of Appeals in today’s City of Seattle v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Effient products contain prasugrel hydrochloride, which is also known as 5-[(1RS)-2-cyclopropyl-1-(2-fluorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridin-2-yl acetate hydrochloride or 2-acetoxy-5-(alpha-cyclopropylcarbonyl-2-fluorobenzy1)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridine hydrochloride, and is covered by the '726 patent. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:28 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Demarest answered “yes” in a decision earlier this month, in Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50940(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County June 9, 2014]. [read post]