Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 6301 - 6320 of 8,250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
Hungar, it seems to me that RCA would matter, even under your view of the world, because if you think that Congress did not codify the existing state of the law as to the standard of proof and you think that section 282 was essentially silent as to the standard of proof, then the question is, what do we do? [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Holders of concealed carry permits in the U.S. are arrested for violent crimes at a rate five times lower than non-license holders (even lower than police officers in many states). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:01 am by Richard Flores
For the past decade, intellectual property rights holders have been fighting to maintain control over their product. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:03 am by Adam Zanjani
Scarlet v SABAM The SABAM is the Belgian equivalent of PRS, a royalty collecting agency representing music artists. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:15 am by sally
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Sony Supply Chain Solutions (Europe) BV, formerly Sony Logistics Europe BV (Case C-153/10); [2011] WLR (D) 130 “A person who made customs declarations in his own name and on his own behalf could not rely on a binding tariff information of which he was not the holder, but which associated company on whose instructions he made those declarations. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:16 pm
Also, the State Secretary states that if copyright holders want to protect their work, they need to start applying technological measures. [read post]