Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 28,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2010, 6:21 pm
In Village Square Condominium of Orlando, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
State, 652 So. 2d 344, 346 (Fla. 1995); Lightbourne v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm
Lee, 52 M.J. 51, 53 (C.A.A.F. 1999), in light ofStrickland v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:41 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 10:35 pm
TSA Passenger Screening: The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in an order that most of the media missed, last week denied a follow up writ of mandamus to compel the rulemaking the court ordered in July 2011 in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
It cites United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:36 am
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Allen (No. 10-63), which has been relisted intermittently a few times, has been relisted once again, as the Court considers what action it should take in the case in light of last week’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
Terrible Ninth Circuit 230(c)(2) Ruling Will Make the Internet More Dangerous–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
19 Sep 2019, 11:06 am
The demise of the Zango v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:12 pm
By Eric Goldman D.C. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:45 pm
§ 1115(b)(4), or to otherwise ensure that the pleadings properly stated a claim for trademark infringement even based on the facts alleged and deemed admitted? [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:10 pm
In Day v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
On 5 December 2011, Red Bull filed an application for a declaration of invalidity based on two earlier marks: 'VERLEIHT FLÜGEL' [gives wings], and 'RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL' registered for ‘energy drinks’ in class 32, in Austria.Red Bull successfully contested the mark- the Cancellation Division found that in light of the repute of their earlier mark, a link could be made in the mind of the public between the two marks, which… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:51 am
Norsworthy will not have the state pay for her reassignment surgery. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:57 pm
" US v. [read post]
