Search for: "State v. Loss" Results 6301 - 6320 of 17,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Supreme Court faulted plaintiff for waiting until 2020 to commence this action to recover monies owed as a result of a legal representation that ended in 2015 but, as prejudgment interest only compensates the judgment creditor for the loss of use of money he or she was owed and is not a penalty, the “responsibility for the delay [in bringing suit] should not be the controlling factor in deciding whether interest is to be computed” (Love v State of New York, 78… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Co., this court stated "If a claimant cannot suffer any pecuniary loss or derive any benefit from the property, he has no insurable interest. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
To substantiate the proposition that “in any case” must be construed widely, the Delhi High Court cited the judgment in Lalu Prasad Yadav v State of Bihar, where the Supreme Court did indeed observe that “in any case” means “in all cases”. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:51 am
We obtained a similar result for Security Mutual Insurance Company in New York state court in Finley v. [read post]