Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 6301 - 6320 of 16,410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
Additional Resources: Millions Live Where Car Insurance Is Unaffordable, Study Says, Jan. 25, 2017, By Ann Carrns, The New York Times More Blog Entries: Entila v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case should not have been stayed because the minor plaintiff is not trying to enjoin any state proceedings. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 2:19 pm by Nani Jansen Reventlow
” This corresponds with the minority dissenting opinion in the African Court case, in which 4 of the 10-judge bench found that the “’State’s duty to enforce collective security, morality and common interest’ cannot justify the criminalization of expression of speech by way of criminal defamation laws of any kind, whether punishable by incarceration or not. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The disparagement provision of the Lanham Act says you can say something nice but not bad about a minority group. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:51 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Increased sentence In 2005, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, Oliver Mills, appellant, was convicted of second-degree rape, third-degree sexual offense, sexual abuse of a minor, and second-degree assault. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Gildin, A Blessing in Disguise: Protecting Minority Faiths Through State Religious Freedom Non-Restoration Acts, (23 Harv. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint and Memorandum in Support (full text of press release, complaint and Memorandum in support of TRO) in State of Hawai'i v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
” Parties’ Conflicting Submissions Warrant Evidentiary Hearing of Minority Shareholder’s Dissolution Petition Kocak v Dargin, 2017 NY Slip Op 30051(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 4, 2017]. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]