Search for: "Stephens v State"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 6,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 2:17 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the senior Justice in what we often think of as the Court’s more liberal wing, wrote the primary dissent on behalf of that group, which also includes Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Bucaria in Gitlin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said at issue on this appeal is whether the City of New York and a child protective service, defendant Louise Wise Services (LWS), sued herein as Louise Wise Agency, are insulated by immunity from liability for injuries allegedly sustained by children, both in connection with their judicial placement into the foster care system and subsequently, while in the custody of various foster homes. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:24 am
Commander Stephen C. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:27 am
SEC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
16 Jun 2025, 1:34 pm
From the publisher: “In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:12 am
Nathan, Stephen Amdur and Colin Bumby. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”· Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”· Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India· Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
How do you think Hamilton would have viewed the state of modern Supreme Court nominations? [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
This excerpt chronicles Donald’s journey to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights in the Supreme Court of Canada and sets the stage for understanding the impacts of R. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:00 am
Key Findings Although there is no empirical standard for what constitutes a “fair share” of the tax burden, tax fairness is often used by leading international organizations, such as the European Commission, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) such as the Tax Justice Network, to justify higher taxes on businesses and corporations. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
