Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 6321 - 6340 of 32,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The petitioner argued that the judgment “unambiguously” precluded the action and that the appeals court only refused to apply the judgment bar due to two incorrect propositions that were previously rejected by the Supreme Court: (1) that when the US prevails in an FTCA action, the district court must dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and (2) a jurisdictional dismissal does not trigger the judgment bar. [read post]
The online event will take place on Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:30 AM PDT / 1:30 PM EDT. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:58 am by Bill Raftery
Legislatures Coming Into Session Utah 1/23/12 Minnesota 1/24/12 Committee Activity of Note January 23 South Dakota House Judiciary Committee HB 1064 Allows the Supreme Court to establish certain rules for the use of interactive audio visual equipment and to provide for the collection and deposit of fees for the use thereof. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:44 am
Denny’s Corporation, asserts claims under New Jersey law for consumer fraud, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1, et seq., and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under the New Jersey U.C.C., N.J.S.A. 12A:2-314(1)-(2). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:20 pm
  This case presents the following issues:  (1) Does a worker’s assignment to the worker’s union of a cause of action for meal and rest period violations carry with it the worker’s right to sue in a representative capacity under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Section 8 deals with exemption from disclosure of information and is extracted in its entirety:  "8. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am by John L. Welch
Volta, 82 USPQ2d 1339 (TTAB 2007) [Board rejected Australian Applicants' claim of misunderstanding as to the requirements of Section 1(a)]; Standard Knitting, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:44 am by Apostolos Anthimos
It is noteworthy that the provision does not refer to the court, but to its respective judge, which implies that no oral hearing is needed. 2: The application is dismissed, if it does not fulfil the requirements stipulated in the Regulation, or if the applicant does not state the information provided by Article 8 EAPO, or if (s)he does not proceed to the requested amendments or corrections of the application within the time limit set by the Judge. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Attorney Offices announcing that no later than March 1, 2012, they are to allow "fast-track" dispositions for all illegal reentry cases prosecuted under 8 U.S.C. 1326. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v ASG Consulting Corp., 4 Misc 3d 1019(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 50967[U], * 6, * 8 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2004]). [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm by Frank Cranmer
“Hey Siri, what does ‘independent’ mean? [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:36 pm by Bill Otis
It was an 8-1 holding written by that bloodlusting fanatic, Sandra Day O'Connor. [read post]