Search for: "Case v. People" Results 6321 - 6340 of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
  Via Eugene Volokh, the issue arose in a California case, People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 9:33 pm
Lemerond v. 20th Century Fox, No. 07-4635, 2008 WL 918579 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html The following cases recently were denied review: Carter v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
’) (citations omitted).Although several cases address res gestae evidence in terms of its contemporaneity to the charged events, see People v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:12 pm
That seems likely to to be the case with the decision of the the court of Appeals in People v Mattocks (_ NY3d _, 2009 NY Slip Op 03408[4/30/09) a decision which mostly addresses whether creasing a Metrocard to fool the card reader into allowing unpaid swipes constitutes forgery. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
McNamara can be reconciled with the landmark Court of Criminal Appeal judgment, People (DPP) v MacEoin [1978] IR 27. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:45 am by Julie Lam
On May 25, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted the application for leave to appeal in Patterson v Nichols, Nos. 142438-9 and 142441, ordering that the cases be argued and submitted to the Court together. [read post]
  Between 2019-2023, travel to Oakland decreased by nearly 2 million people, which the OAK attributes to the Covid-19 pandemic. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 pm
…”Given the arguments made in its motion for reconsideration (which the court denied), plaintiff undoubtedly disputes these allegations, though it does not address the fees issue in its trial brief.The case cite is The Christensen Firm v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
But one thing that this opinion might teach people is that if you feel like getting a ton of Ecstasy pills from Germany to the United States, simply mailing them there (in this case, to California) via the USPS doesn't really work so well. [read post]