Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 26,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 4:52 pm
Failure of a claimant to provide the required proof within 15 days after the effective date of the demand waives the claimant’s right to receive those proceeds. 4. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:52 pm
Failure of a claimant to provide the required proof within 15 days after the effective date of the demand waives the claimant’s right to receive those proceeds. 4. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 7:19 pm
(Ref: 4/21/03 Memo Q21) Death of a Claimant Prior to Exhaustion of the Medicare Set-Aside Money Once the Regional Office (RO) and the contractor responsible for monitoring the claimant’s case verify that all of the claimant’s claims have been paid, then any amount left over in the claimant’s WCMSA may be disbursed pursuant to State probate law. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 4:53 pm
Bd., 973 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding E/C estopped from relying on statute of limitations defense where claimant failed to file PFB because of E/C’s misrepresentation concerning claimant’s PIR). [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 4:53 pm
Bd., 973 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding E/C estopped from relying on statute of limitations defense where claimant failed to file PFB because of E/C’s misrepresentation concerning claimant’s PIR). [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
The court rejects claims of co-authorship, states emphatically that "mistakes are not admissions" and points out the Copyright Office's procedures to correct errors. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:45 am
For example, this story in the Wall Street Journal discusses the $20 billion fund that BP is establishing to satisfy claims arising from the gulf disaster, and says that the fund will speed up payouts to claimants, who won't have to wait 20 years like the Valdez claimants did.That's misleading because the award ExxonMobil litigated for 20 years was a punitive damages award. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:35 am
Background The Claimants/Respondents TLU and TLV are the wife and teenage daughter of Claimant TLT, an adult Iranian immigrant (a party to the claim, but not the appeal). [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:09 am
The claimant alleged that respondent’s use of the mark that had been developed and owned by the claimant clearly mislead the consumers as to the identity of the manufacturer, since the respondent’s website created a false impression that it was an official website of the goods dealer or manufacturer. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 7:57 am
In cases of selling away the investor is unaware that the advisor’s investments are improper. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:20 pm
The claimant’s solicitors have said the decision will be appealed and it is possible that the case will be fast-tracked to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:36 am
It is true that Austrian courts are – in principle – bound by the statement of the claimant when they examine their jurisdiction (see section 41(2) JN) and that the claimant did not rely upon section 99 JN. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 11:51 am
Claimants and their counsel are conversely prohibited from speaking with a Respondent’s examining physician. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:31 am
The September 6 award of $39 million to one claimant constitutes the second-largest award in the SEC whistleblower program’s history. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:57 pm
Despite the claimant’s solicitors being based in an area where the Guideline Hourly Rates are lower, they are claiming a rate that is 78% higher than the defendant’s. [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 11:33 pm
By the time that the summary judgment application was heard, the insurer had paid the capital amount to the claimants, including the second claimant’s interests and costs, but it maintained reliance upon the deferment clause in relation to the first claimant’s claim for interest from the date of demand in September 2022 and costs. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Mr Justice Warby’s judgment on Friday, awarding damages of £24,000 to the claimant ([2017] EWHC 433 (QB)) was widely picked up on mainstream and social media. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
I recently had dinner with a gentleman who in a “past life” was a top executive in one of the nation’s largest insurance companies. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
While the Court’s latter holding concerning the retroactivity of the 2015 amendment will likely have little impact on employers, the Court’s decision with regard to a claimant’s required evidentiary showing under N.J.A.C. 12:17-9.3(b) may increase the number of employees who seek accommodations for health problems aggravated by working conditions. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 2:15 am
Those claims often focus on whether or not the claimant's past work can still be performed (and therefore, the nature of the past work is a central issue), and whether or not the claimant acquired transferable job skills. [read post]
