Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 7:00 pm
B. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 12:34 pm
Koskinen was brought in to help the struggling company right itself in 2008 after the company it was taken over by the U.S. government. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Snyder: 'No Plan B' if Proposal 1 fails <> Businesses recognized for Environmental Leadership - MDEQ honored 20 facilities as Michigan Environmental Leaders for their outstanding, voluntary environmental stewardship -- [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
A person exposed to infected blood from used needles can contract an infectious disease such as HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:10 pm
Unfortunately, the newest Senate Intelligence bill is one of the worst yet.Cybersecurity bills aim to facilitate information sharing between companies and the government, but their broad immunity clauses for companies, vague definitions, and aggressive spying powers make them secret surveillance bills. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Last week Advocate General Mengozzi gave his Opinion in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing - & Management- Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz [available so far in 17 EU official languages, but not English, notes Merpel] on the interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95, following a request by the Bundespatentgericht (German Federal Patent Court) to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling.The underlying dispute… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:45 am
As an additional justification for the conclusion of obviousness, the Examiner also added these additional statements about Petite:Petite et al. disclose remote monitoring and control device can either for utility company (C-1, L-60 to C-2, L-6) or environmental or safety systems (C-2, L-7-14) in the same field of endeavor for the purpose of providing multiple usages of the apparatus. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:05 am
§ 1030(a)(2)(C). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:58 am
The attorney answered by admitting to her illegal conduct, and multiple violations of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rule 3.4(c) by knowingly failing to comply with her probation, Rule 8.4(b) by committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on her fitness as a lawyer, and Rule 8.4(d) by engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
That new agreement provided the “consent” required under Section 365(c)(1)(B) for the Debtors to assume the otherwise non-assignable, and therefore non-assumable, trademark license agreement. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
That new agreement provided the “consent” required under Section 365(c)(1)(B) for the Debtors to assume the otherwise non-assignable, and therefore non-assumable, trademark license agreement. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
” Section 162(b) excepts charitable contributions and gifts from business deductions. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
My husband and fellow law professor Michael C. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:14 pm
Laws c. 191, § 1A(4). [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
In deciding whether NLRB law reasonably permits the settlement, the Board should consider whether (a) all parties agreed to the settlement, (b) the settlement is reasonable in light of the ULP charge, risks of litigation, and stage of the litigation, (c) the settlement is free from coercion, duress, and fraud, and (d) the accused has a history of ULPs or of breaching settlement agreements resolving ULP claims. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:06 am
(b), (c).) [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 6:20 am
Considering a future purchase wasn’t concrete enough to show a sufficient likelihood of being harmed in the future Damages: for 23(b)(3) certification, plaintiffs had to show that common issues predominated. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 5:11 am
After negotiations with the credit card company, you agree to pay $3,000 and the credit card company agrees not to pursue the debt further. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
Companies and inventors are free to hide their innovations as trade secrets, which are not subject to term limits. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
The term "premises," which was used in Sections 9.b. and 9.c., was not a defined term in the policy. [read post]
