Search for: "Davis v. Davis" Results 6321 - 6340 of 8,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Sixth Amendment Center, David Carroll surveys state practices relating to the use of non-lawyer judges in criminal cases, an issue presented in Davis v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
  A legal challenge to S.1 of DRIPA by MPs David Davis and Tom Watson is under way. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:43 am by Venkat
See this post by Wendy Davis that mentions possible amendments to the VPPA that would tweak these to make sharing easier. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The judgments in question are these: BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87; [2022] 1 WLR 1349 (1 November 2021) A v M [2021] EWFC 89; [2022] 1 FCR 445 (9 November 2021) Aylward-Davies v Chesterman [2022] EWFC 4; [2022] 2 FCR 541 (4 February 2022) Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30; [2022] 2 FCR 712 (12 April 2022) XZ v YZ [2022] EWFC 49 (20 May 2022) (this being the decision granting an interim RRO in the case later reported as Gallagher v… [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
For the majority:  “A legal malpractice claim requires that the plaintiff show that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession which results in actual damages to a plaintiff, and that the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence” (AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 25 July 2012, Nicola Davies J gave judgment in the case of AAA v Associated Newspapers (heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012). [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicola Davies J concluded the hearing of the CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston. [read post]