Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 6,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 6:43 pm
Will the citizen (and resident alien, really) v noncitizen distinction continue to apply; and will the territorial v nonterritorial distinction continue to apply in counterterroism legal regimes? [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Appellant contends that (1) there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions of second degree murder, hit-and-run and gross vehicular manslaughter, (2) the trial court gave erroneous causation instructions to the jury, thereby depriving him of due process and a fair trial, and (3) the upper term sentence on his felony hit-and-run conviction violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution as set forth in Cunningham v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:57 am
State Higher Educ. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
” And while BP, Shell and ConocoPhillips have joined the United States Climate Action Partnership, which is lobbying for mandatory carbon limits, and are investing in renewable energy sources like wind, solar and biofuels, ExxonMobil remains coy about which, if any, carbon constraints it would support and has stated unequivocally that the company will not be putting money into renewables. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:12 am
Via Scotusblog, he United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Arave v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
The essay claims that the United States entered such a period after 9/11, and that we remain there still. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:28 am
The crime scene described at the beginning of United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 4:14 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:16 am
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 485 (1928)(Brandeis, J., dissenting).Download sutton_opinion.pdf [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:30 am
Supreme Court in Kansas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
