Search for: "Does 1 through 12" Results 6321 - 6340 of 15,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
”[12]  This characterization does not jibe with the many instances where FCC rulings [13] and statements by Chairman Pai [14]and others emphasized the disastrous impact on network neutrality regulation. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:38 pm
At best it makes it easier for the future prosecutor to fill out his complaint when a new crime occurs. 12-1-2009 New York: Nostalgic photos of summer fun and happy holidays flashed on a large screen as law enforcement officers and victims' advocates watched the story of "Julie" unfold, beginning with her childhood. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The organic layers from the four extraction steps are combined and dried over MgSO4 overnight, then filtered through a 12 mm Celite pad. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 12:50 pm by Bill Marler
Observation #12: Failure to take apart equipment as necessary to ensure thorough cleaning. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
I believe the “benefit of the employer” rule does not apply to this case. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 9:03 am by Lewis Gainor
If a person’s license is suspended or revoked as a result of 3 convictions within 12 months, the Secretary will suspend the license as follows: If there has been no prior suspension or revocation within the last 7 years: 15 through 44 points. 2 month suspension. 45 through 74 points. 3 month suspension. 75 through 89 points. 6 month suspension. 90 through 99 points. 9 month suspension. 100 through 109 points. 12 month suspension.… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Final Rule does not apply to court orders approving settlements with private parties. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 8:26 am by Bill Marler
The patients ranged in age from less than 1 to 99 years old. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
But it does raise an obvious question for treaty supporters: what do they propose to do between now and then—whenever the then may be? [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by Eoin Daly
Considering that by the terms of Article 75 of the Civil Code: “On the day designated by the parties, the registry office official … will read to the prospective spouses Articles 12, 213 (paras. 1 and 2), 214 (para 1) and 215 (para 1) of this Code. [read post]