Search for: "English v. English" Results 6321 - 6340 of 11,203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 8:48 am by Donald Clarke
(Law on Legislation, Art. 8(v); that's one reason why re-education through labor, with its flimsy statutory basis, has been under attack.) [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:47 pm
  SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 is a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling from last week on an action that seems to have been going on for rather a long time -- which indeed it has. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that hypothesis, it would have been difficult to defend the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888 to the effect that the English court should normally refuse a stay of its own proceedings if it would be likely to resolve the question of validity significantly earlier. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
This Opinion is not yet available in English, but this Kat's computer didn't even wait to be instructed and turned the entire text into an unofficial but navigable English translation, on which the following is based.Coty Germany makes and sells perfumes and cosmetics in Germany, including a women's fragrance [As a Kat, Merpel has always found this term strange: it ought to mean 'the fragrance of more than one woman', while the thing being made and sold doesn't smell of women at… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
HITSELBERGER was then observed taking the classified documents from the printer, folding them, and placing them into an Arabic-English Dictionary and subsequently placing the dictionary into his personal backpack. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The issues are similar to those in Ritz Hotel Ltd v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:16 am
 Patent law practitioners and students around the world will instantly recognise those words as emanating from the famous US Supreme Court ruling on patent subject matter in Diamond v Chakrabarty back in 1980. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses a recent decision by the First Circuit upholding a conviction for translating pro-jihad writings from Arabic into English and uploading them onto the Internet. [read post]