Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 30,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 4:32 am
Co., 50 Cal. 2d 654 (1958), and Gruenberg v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:41 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
In two recent decisions, Fordham v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:46 pm
In two joined cases, Abanca Corporación Bancaria SA v García Salamanca Santos (Case C-70/17) and Bankia SA v Lau Mendoza and Rodríguez Ramírez (Case C-179/17) EU:2019:250, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) considered the power of national courts to substitute national law provisions to save a loan where deleting unfair terms would prejudice the consumer. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, stating that the criminal standard of proof was not required for confiscation, and that the English court was entitled to consider evidence which formed the basis of a previous charge against the appellants in Portugal as there was no link between the proceedings. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, stating that the criminal standard of proof was not required for confiscation, and that the English court was entitled to consider evidence which formed the basis of a previous charge against the appellants in Portugal as there was no link between the proceedings. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Christopher v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
The case is Probert v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:44 am
The case is entitled Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 11:39 am
You'd think so, but the kind of hits I lay down in this game fall into the Holt v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm
Central Mortgage Company v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm
A. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:21 am
Google, Inc. (05 Civ. 8136 (DC)) has denied the motion for final approval of the proposed amended settlement agreement between Google and the Guild, stating that the ASA is “not fair, adequate and reasonable”. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:36 pm
” SEC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:12 am
The inference appears to be that the platforms have fair trading obligations to ensure that the apps they distribute meet privacy standards. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:54 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:09 pm
Austria (civil defamation), Bédat v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 2:11 pm
This both fair and clear. [read post]
