Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 16,491
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am
If you want to make phone calls on behalf of Donald Trump’s presidential bid – and I sincerely hope that nobody reading this column would want to do such a thing – you will have to agree to the terms of this contract, posted at the talk.donaldjtrump.com website (and reprinted in full at the bottom of this post). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:12 am
Our criminal defense attorneys in Fort Lauderdale know that this sets an important legal precedent that we hope other jurisdictions will follow, particularly for as long as we continue to have a patchwork of marijuana legislation from state-to-state. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
I would hope so.Q. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:11 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
Verner and most recently in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
One hopes that, sixty-two years after Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
Plaintiff asserted claims under the Consumer Product Safety Act and state law. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:55 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm
This time interval varies from state to state; in our home state of Texas, for example, the standard SOL for an injury claim is 2 years after the date of the injury. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:04 am
Steele v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm
Cmwlth. 2000) (holding that claimant who quit to return to another state to care for his emotionally disturbed child was eligible for benefits); Miksic v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:08 pm
Costa Rica) Björn Arp, Charanne B.V. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:27 pm
For myself, I consider it significant also that in the email of 3 February 2014 Mr Shrimpton stated, “I very much wish that I had seen this morning’s application. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:04 am
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:04 am
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
So those hoping a court will rule on whether the USOC is applying trademark law overzealously will probably have to keep waiting. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
In general, section 2(a) will be infringed by non-trivial state (or state-sponsored) interference with an Aboriginal sacred site. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 7:45 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
