Search for: "High v State"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 35,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2020, 4:45 pm
IndiaQayoom v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Many of those people are Republican state legislators, but even the legislators who are skeptical will be under the same high pressure that every other Republican is now under to deny reality.It is true that the Supreme Court would not be likely to weigh in, so long as the legal fight is over the current flurry of baseless suits from Trump’s lawyers. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm
By Jack Wass (Stout Street Chambers, Wellington, New Zealand) In the recent decision of Hebei Huaneng Industrial Development Co Ltd v Shi,[1] the High Court of New Zealand was faced with an argument that a money judgment of the Higher People’s Court of Hebei should not be enforced because the courts of China are not independent of the political arms of government and therefore do not qualify as “courts” for the purpose of New Zealand’s rules on the… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:37 pm
Martin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:53 am
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
The Supreme Court stated it would “put the principle of separability of the arbitration agreement too high” to say that a choice of law to govern the main contract has “little to say” about the choice of law of the arbitration agreement. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
The Court of Appeal considered that the acts by Russia upon which Ukraine relies for the purposes of the Duress Defence were acts of high policy (per Lord Neuberger’s ‘third rule’ in Belhaj v Straw [2017] UKSC 3). [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm
Delay in reporting and the involvement of “high-level” or “substantial authority” personnel, as defined by the Guidelines, often weigh against application of this provision. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
In 2010, the high court in Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
In 2010, the high court in Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am
, Lewis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:39 am
As discussed in its Fiscal Year 2019 report on the top management and performance challenges facing AbilityOne, the OIG stated that it would need additional resources to carry out these oversight functions, an indication that in the future the OIG could, with enough funding, even more aggressively utilize these tools to target uniform compliance across the Commission’s entire contracting network. [6] What does this mean? [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
(Complaint, Lematta v. [read post]
