Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 6321 - 6340 of 8,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
In other Court action, forty-eight states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:25 am by David Oscar Markus
Richard Klugh won the case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:53 am by SHG
  It's a 5-4 decision, thus leaving the rights protected by our Constitution in the hands of a single individual, Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose individual views more than any other dictate the fundamental law of the United States of America. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Erin Miller
United States dissent, later embraced by the Court in Katz v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Turning back to a 1994 ruling, in Davis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:15 am by Kent Scheidegger
Today, the United States Supreme Court pruned back the artificial rule it created in Miranda v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:44 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 09-223, Levin v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:44 pm by Daniel Solove
His work related to sex offenders has been cited by federal courts and, in particular, the United States Supreme Court majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 7:59 pm
" In a concurring opinion in the Supreme Court flag-burning case (Texas v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 2:19 pm by Guest Blogger
Steve VladeckMuch has been written about Justice Kennedy’s 2003 opinion for the majority in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am by INFORRM
While each of the EU states is left to its own devices in ensuring that a proper decorum is maintained between Articles 8 and 10, should a state fail to reach an appropriate balance it can be brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) for a spot of marriage guidance. [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:29 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
After getting federal law wrong in Kennedy v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:56 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case is McComish, et al., v. [read post]