Search for: "Label v Label" Results 6321 - 6340 of 13,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
 Because the Ninth Circuit holds that included in the list of crimes that aren't necessarily crimes of violence is a conviction for attempted rape in the fourth degree in Delaware.It's also proof that you can't necessarily tell the nature of the crime just from the label that the state legislature as appended to it. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Question: You quote Justice Tom Clark as saying that the power of assigning opinions is perhaps a Chief Justice’s “single most influential function,” which he labeled as an exercise in “judicial-political discretion. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Dr. Mel Kramer
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
A: 1928 Rome * Q: What brand name used to be called “Bib-Label Lithiated Lemon-Lime Soda”? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:47 am by m zamora
Pliva, Inc.One such case is Brinkley v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
  The worst of which is Ramirez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am by Lyle Denniston
Coca-Cola – private right to sue to challenge beverage labeling as misleading (Justices Alito and Breyer are recused) Tuesday, April 22: Susan B. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 Not only is the exterior labelled 'Dumb Starbucks', but inside almost exactly replicates every aspect of one of the most recognised (and valuable) brands in the world - the paper cups, the drinks sizes, the menu, the easy-listening CDs for sale. [read post]
The post Cotter v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKSC 69 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
 Even after all of this gets discovered -- and the trial judge (for whatever reason) refuses to bounce Juror No. 6 -- then, during deliberations, this juror conducts his own investigation outside of the jury box (reading pill labels, researching the internet, etc.) and tells other jurors about his discoveries. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
The dispute centred on the wording used by the company on their labels; the front label said 'Warsteiner Premium Light‘ and 'Warsteiner Mark [Brand] Premium Fresh‘, and on the back the label said ‘bottled in their new Paderborn Brewery’. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Can we do better if we get rid of the raw materials label? [read post]