Search for: "POST v. STATE" Results 6321 - 6340 of 98,753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2023, 6:28 am by Unreported Opinions
Read the opinion   The post STEPHON NATHANIEL BEALE v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
  The post Court Denies Injunction that Would Terminate Two Workers’ Employment appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
  The post Court Denies Injunction that Would Terminate Two Workers’ Employment appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am by SHG
An employer or any other person or entity that violates this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor… Before you ask, sure, that would seem to mean that if an employee (and applicant for employment as well as stated in a footnote in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Colorado handed down the first state supreme court case on the law of reverse keyword searches for Google terms: People v. [read post]
  The post India Supreme Court rules against legalizing same-sex marriages appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:13 am by Unreported Opinions
Abel or affording him an opportunity to object to the […] The post TREVE ANTONIO ABEL v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:10 am by Unreported Opinions
Employment law — Wrongful discharge — Implicit defamation This case arises out of the termination of Anna Mantegna’s employment as an assistant state’s attorney — and statements made following her termination — shortly after the Office of the State’s Attorney for Baltimore City (“BCSAO”) learned that Mantegna may have leaked an investigation of the Baltimore […] The post ANNA MANTEGNA v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:07 am by Unreported Opinions
., appellant, guilty of firstd-egree and […] The post MARTIN EDWARD GOODWIN, JR. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Similarly, in South Africa, as Geo Quinot details in his own interesting post, there is also wide and explicit recognition of the need for judicial deference to the executive’s interpretation. [read post]