Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 18,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 4:03 pm
The EEOC ruled Macy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:46 am
McKinney v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:19 pm
May 9, 2018) (putative class action alleging defendant telecommunications provider engaged in overbilling practices by promising low prices during the sales process but charging higher amounts and adding unauthorized charges in violation of the Federal Communications Act) Green v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Case citation: EarthCam, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:43 am
In overturning the Court of Appeal’s decision, the UKSC criticised it for relying on British Glanzstoff Manufacturing Co Ltd v General Accident, Fire and Life Assurance Corpn Ltd [1913] AC 143. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
Overstreet v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Level One Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
In H&H Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
The Petitioner, however, upon learning of the rejection, notified the Respondent that the strawberries were hot and that the Respondent had a claim against the carrier rather than the Petitioner.After its rejection, the Respondent routed the shipment to a retailer located in Philadelphia, which accepted the shipment at a reduced price. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:57 pm
Kelley v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am
The developer had opted to tax the property, meaning the purchase price included an amount in respect of VAT. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
Not only were they swindled into selling their homes at undervalued prices but, in most cases, were also victims of dishonesty by solicitors appointed to represent them. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
(Trustee of) v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
”[2] Another retrospective from 2009 into hospital mergers found mixed results; one merger resulted in higher prices, the other did not.[3] Finally, a retrospective into grocery mergers found that “mergers in highly concentrated markets are most frequently associated with price increases, while mergers in less concentrated markets are most often associated with price decreases. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:48 pm
Here's a pop quiz for Corporations and Business Associations students based on the recent case of Gatz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
Eldmann v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
” “Discrimination” can be based on legally protected criteria, such as race or gender, or it can be any differential treatment between any customers (such as “price discrimination”). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm
Gross v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:49 pm
USA v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:40 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
