Search for: "STATE v. SMALL" Results 6321 - 6340 of 16,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2014, 9:44 am by Abbott & Kindermann
For more on the history and significance of initiatives, check out the Initiative and Referendum Institute.The significance of the right of initiative and referendum was not lost on the California Supreme Court in the decision of Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court S207173. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
 The owner stated, “It wastes time to fight back. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am by Jill Gross
  Thus, the Court has held that the FAA preempts state statutes that prohibit the arbitration of a particular type of claim (Preston v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
’ The second search, done on June 5, 2012, searched for `polygraph legal in which states. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
As part of our annual review of defamation law in the jurisdiction, we examine two notable reported judgments from 2021 and, as the Northern Ireland Assembly’s legislative programme reaches the final stages, the nature of the reforms proposed by the Defamation Bill. 2021 Cases: MacAirt and Others v JPI Media NI and Foster v Jessen Two reported judgments stood out in 2021. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
And yet there is ultimately a thoughtlessness here: what may be possible against a small and struggling state (and even that is not clear) may actually backfire when used against a state whose own power and cultural self-confidence as great as that of Europe. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:30 am
     Finally, the December 2007 Marciano decision makes a cameo appearance in the New York Court of Appeals' controversial February 2008 decision in Tzolis v. [read post]
In a comprehensive judgment spanning some 374 pages and 1,153 paragraphs, Justice Jagot considered various business interruption claims from nine small businesses across four different states. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
It did so by emphasizing the small size and minimal impact of the 8-foot no-approach zone: "… Unlike the 15-foot zone in Schenck v. [read post]