Search for: "State Bank v. United States"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 7,415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
Here's the ending of Justice Kennedy's opinion for the Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:17 am
5th.circuit.png In bank and credit card fraud case, while hearsay and double hearsay issues were presented by the introduction of bank computerized printouts reflecting reports of cardholder telephone calls and the statements of cardholders concerning lost, stolen or not received cards, the statements and printouts were admissible under residual hearsay exception based on “equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness”, in United… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Bank of Boston v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The United States Supreme Court released a 183 page opinion today in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:15 am
Subscription required for online access: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/subscribe.jsp Supreme Court Announces Special Sitting Thursday "The long wait for the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
Bank Board Minutes Admitted To Show Board Did Not Receive Material Loan Information Under FRE 803(7)
20 Jan 2010, 1:23 am
6th.admend.png In a bank fraud prosecution, bank board minutes were admitted under FRE 803(7) to show the non-existence of information; in particular, that the board did not receive material information about certain loan transactions, in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:37 pm
Nat’l Bank, Jackson Miss. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
Walter Olson provides us with a video of John Stossel investigating the Fells Acre prosecutions and convictions (be sure to see Stossel's reaction at the 6:07 mark): Speaking of Attorneys General, whimsical CT law blogger Ryan McKeen stirred up a hornet's nest this week when he asked if current Secretary of State and Gubernatorial Attorney General candidate Susan Bysiewicz was actually qualified for the position (the answer: it depends). [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:21 am
United States, No. 08-1564 (4th Cir. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:15 pm
. **** Short Definition An Eligible Contract Participant generally means: Financial Institutions Insurance Companies Mutual Funds Certain commodity pools with $5 million or more of assets Certain organizations with, generally, $10 million or more of assets ERISA plans with $5 million or more of assets Certain governmental entities Certain broker-dealers and investment banks FCMs Floor brokers An individual with generally $10 million or more of assets Certain brokers or investment… [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:33 am
Super. 158, 164 (App.Div.1967); see United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:30 am
Co. of America v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:32 pm
Collins, for example, describes one of her first oral arguments, in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Stiftelsen SINTEF (EPLAW) Poland Voivodeship Administrative Court: Design, freedom and Polish law: VI SA / Wa 518/09 (Class 99) Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia looking into setting up special IP courts (IP Factor) South Africa Western Cape High Court finds in favour of Trimega, grants interim interdict preventing Real World Diagnostics from using IP related to drink-driving breathalysers (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Civil Law Reform Bill: latest news (PatLit) UK… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
White v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:39 am
"Desertpeace - http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/ News From Underground: FOIA filed for OPR report on torture lawyersBy mcm "Founded in September 2008, the RJSC works to bring about the criminal prosecution of top government officials in the United States alleged to have committed war crimes. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:58 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal ProcedureFree With Registration: Panel Rejects Probation Condition That Sex Offender Report "Serious Romantic Relationship" United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
