Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 6321 - 6340 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
A recent United States Tax Court case, Urgent Care Nurses Registry, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
China National Chartering Company Ltd v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, Gard Marine and Entergy Ltd  v China National Chartering Company Ltd & Anor, and Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, heard 1-3 November 2016 R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Matich v McLernon Matich’s action concerned four allegedly defamatory publications on the internet. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:08 am
  The Commission’s strategy passed muster with a reviewing court in the United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am by Charlotte Bamford
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am by Peter Mahler
The case and Justice Knipel’s decision in Celauro v 4C Foods Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 31917(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Oct. 12, 2016], is the latest in a series of litigations and court rulings between two factions of the Celauro family beginning around 2005, following the death of Nathan’s father the year before. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:30 am by Aimee Denholm
On Wednesday 2nd November, the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (A) (A Child) (by her litigation Friend B) v Secretary of State for Health. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unsurprisingly, this conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents (such as City of Ladue v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
When Mr Booker says that M’s financial resources have been seized by the British State, he is probably referring to the fact that the court has ordered M’s affairs should be managed by the Official Solicitor NOT Mrs Kirk, who the court evidently does not feel is capable of acting in M’s best interests, despite her belief that she is doing just that. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]