Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 29,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
” This ruling was a surprise to some because of the Court’s previous ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:54 am
The Act makes it unlawful for data brokers to sell, license, rent, trade, transfer, release, disclose, provide access to, or otherwise make available personally identifiable sensitive data of a United States individual (i.e., people residing in the United States) to any foreign adversary or any entity controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Because of Congress' repeated reservation of the "secretary's" powers, in Astra v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:57 pm
” Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, Zarda v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:50 am
Flag of Sri Lanka Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm
, Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
It puts marriage equality advocates where they were before the litigation: trying to change things state by state and then getting Congress to repeal DOMA after enough states change their laws (See also scenario 6). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
In 1906, England’s Parliament codified uberrimae fidei; the United States Congress, however, never addressed the issue. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:53 am
This is quite different from the passport provision recently held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:42 am
The ANPR itself is EPA's response to the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:13 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:58 am
However, the US Congress failed to approve the measure partly as a result of low voter turnout. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:02 am
“”Administrative State Is THE Leading Threat to Civil Liberties of Our Era'”: Nick Gillespie interview with Philip Hamburger at Reason; Beyond the deference debates: White House Counsel Don McGahn speaks on Chenery I v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 12:45 am
Per Blockbuster, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
Federal Act unless that [is] the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.' " (quoting Rice v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am
”) United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 7:44 am
Because the Supreme Court granted cert in King v. [read post]
